Moreover, pixel settling can be boosted by more aggressive overdrive and by "recharging" the pixels more often, as mentionned above, all of which would help reducing cross-talk considerably. When it comes to motion blur reduction via strobed backlight at a relatively low input refresh rate, such as 120 Hz (where it is also more needed than at 240 Hz), internal refresh rate up-scaling would be especially beneficial as the faster pixel update would leave more time for the pixels to settle before the backlight strobe. 240 Hz), no such temporal up-scaling is implemented. 120 Hz) and the refresh rate would be up-scaled to a higher monitor refresh rate (e.g. BTW, pixel inversion artifacts result in vertical line patterns on this monitor.Īlthough most of these positive effects would even apply if the PC provided a lower refresh rate (e.g. Dithering and pixel inversion artifacts become less obvious as more of the "bad" frequencies fall beyond the flicker-fusion frequency.Motion clarity is improved even without using special motion blur reduction techniques.Unfortunately, it also has to be more aggressive to have an effect, for the same reason. Overdrive can be more aggressive because it is applied for a shorter time.Pixel persistence is reduced because pixels are "recharged" more often.Input lag is reduced for obvious reasons.Having a refresh rate as high as 240 Hz might seem as a commercial gimmick but it is not, for quite a number of reasons:.But even if this was true, users might want to use this monitor also at lower refresh rates, for example when playing games with too complex scenes to be rendered fast enough. One might argue that strobing the backlight at 240 Hz would create more artifacts than it would do any good, especially given that motion blur is small anyway at such high refresh rates. Officially, motion blur reduction is not made available, although it seems to be fully implemented and functional.The overdrive (in BenQ-terminology: AMA) is way too aggressive – as is standard for BenQ gaming monitors, unfortunately –, and BenQ still refuses to provide the user with a better overdrive control.Unfortunately, this monitor leaves quite some room for improvement: This might be due to an improved color management which appears to be similar if not identical to the BenQ XL2730Z's color management (both using basically the same REALTEK scaler). Moreover and quite surprisingly, there is no obvious deterioration in image quality when using 240 Hz instead of, say, 120 Hz. The image quality and viewing angles are TN-like bad but not as bad as many of the 144 Hz full-HD monitors, although also this monitor uses just a 6bit+FRC panel rather than a true 8bit panel. However, this monitor neither supports G-Sync or FreeSync (but see below) nor does it provide any option for reducing motion blur (strobed backlight) – at least not "officially", as motion blur reduction can be easily activated and customized via the monitor's service menu (see below). This monitor is one of the first LCDs that supports a maximum refresh rate of 240 Hz out of the box.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |